The disappearing voice of neighborhoods

A troubling new pattern has emerged in local governance—one that seeks to bypass, dismiss, or even discredit public participation. In Nashville, some elected officials appear to be embracing a national movement, rooted in elite policy circles and academic institutions, that encourages them to reinterpret community opposition not as civic engagement but as something to be “overcome.” Framed in books and workshops promoted by housing reform ideologues, this narrative casts residents as obstacles to progress and justifies excluding them from decision-making in the name of expedience. Meanwhile, corporate and institutional investors stand to benefit most—shaping the rules without ever showing up at a community meeting.

​

Most concerning is the shift toward Metro Council members directing the Planning Department to deliver predetermined outcomes, rather than initiating the kind of inclusive, citywide visioning process that defined NashvilleNext. That effort—spanning three years and involving over 18,000 residents—reflected what real public engagement looks like. This isn’t innovation. It’s letting the donor class shape public policy and calling it planning.

​

While reform advocates continue to sell their agenda using powerful language—climate, equity, affordability—the results speak louder. The very households these policies claim to support, especially those earning below 50% of Area Median Income (AMI), are seeing no measurable benefit. Instead of building affordability from the ground up, what we’re getting is a top-down agenda that raises land values, rewards investors, and leaves working families further behind.